Anti-Neocons

Right now my favorite network is RBN and I listen to John Stadtmiller almost every day. I am just getting in Alex Jones, but I want to know what the opinions here are on these two networks, RBN and GCN. I know there are some networks out there with disinformation.

Yesterday on RBN, John Stadmiller was talking about the Hate Crime bill that was just reintroduced, and the guest was saying how it's not on the government sites. It was HR254 David's Law. I went and found it with no problem on the congress web site and read it. While I think it's unnessesary, as state laws already cover violence, I don't see where it hurts free speech at all. It strictly references "bodily harm". This has me wondering who to believe.

Come on, no opinions? NOBODY listens to radio out there?????

The radio is sooooo obsolete. Heres the thing, when it comes to radio or tv I could care less about the host opinions. The media in America is fucken bias and always someone has to give their “expert” opinion something, nothing is neutral, always one sided.

_________________
"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of ... [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." –Thomas Jefferson

Thanks for the replies, but you guys apparently didn't read my post. The two networks I mentioned are alternative truth movement radio available only by satellite, shortwave, or internet. So it's east to get, but not on AM or FM and definitely not mainstream. GCN is the Alex Jones network and RBN is headed by I think John Stadtmiller. I am sure someone listens to these network here. They are the one of the few sources of real news.

Is unnecessary not enough? Cluttering our system with crap that it doesn't need weakens it.

Regardless, how do you feel about the idea that if someone commits a crime, the amount of their sentence or the amount of money they must pay to the victim will fluctuate based on whether or not the prosecution can convince the jury it was based on hate?

And, how do you feel about the fact that EVERY TIME there is a crime, if both sides aren't the same race, culture, etc, that the prosecution will seek to prove it is a hate crime and use the hate card regardless of the evidence?

All I see this doing is sowing further racial and cultural separation and turning every court case into a hate crime if the conditions can possibly allow it.

Should someone's penance honestly be greater if they kill, assault, etc someone out of hate for their race/culture instead of out of any other reason?

No, I agree, I don't see a need for any of this. Our laws already cover violence, whatever the motive. I was simply trying to use an example of where I heard something on a radio show, and when I investigated it, I didn't see what I expected to see.

But this still does not answer my original question.

I listen to the Genesis World Report w/DL Abrahamson, What Really Happened w/Mike Rivero & Alex Jones all on GCN. You can listen to em all on the internet for free or dl from the pirate bay or con cen.

_________________
"A higher level of cannabinoid activity in the human biochemical distribution in the biosphere may be necessary to prevent human extinction" - Dr. Robert Melamede, PhD

more & more people are realizing the media is just a tool. Internet being used for News is increasing.

And i listen to takingaimradio from time to time. That Brezinski false flag thread got me interested in them. Very informative stuff.

_________________